![]() ![]() A total of 40 articles were included in this review and the following five themes were identified from the studies: perceived acceptability and willingness to adhere to lockdown perceived control during lockdown perceived pressures arising from lockdown perceived threat of sanction from others and the procedural (in)justice of lockdown. ![]() The database search initially produced 41,628 articles to screen. A sensitive search strategy was devised and conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science using the following search terms: (adherence OR acceptance OR agreement OR trust OR distrust OR compliance OR willing*) OR (perceived coerc* OR percept* coerc* OR pressure OR force OR influence OR control OR threat OR justice) AND (lockdown) AND (COVID OR SARS-CoV-2 OR COVID-19). ![]() ![]() Arksey & O’Malley’s (2005) framework for conducting scoping reviews was chosen. This aim of this scoping review is to map what is known about perceived coercion, perceived pressures and procedural justice within the context of the general population’s experience of ‘lockdowns’ imposed by governments worldwide in response to the increased transmission of COVID-19. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |